Since existence of mankind, on the earth were, is and there will be conflicts. Some were developed between continents, others - between groups and certain people. Perhaps such mekhan_zm as the state, it was created just for the purpose of permission of controversial issues. Many ancient governors became famous for the ability to solve the conflicts. In this article we will consider a concept and types of the social conflicts.
At first we will deal with a concept. The conflict is a disagreement of people or groups in views, desire to remain on the advantageous party. Let's pass to more detailed consideration of types of the social conflicts and their examples.
Between certain parties
- Vertical. The dispute arises between people with different powers of authority. For example, the head's conflict with the subordinate worker, the founder of firm with small branch.
- Horizontal. The conflict is developed between people with identical powers of authority. It can be managers of one level, suppliers with consumers.
On signs
- Open. When collision of the parties is obviously expressed. Interaction of such dispute is regulated by norms which correspond to the moment and the status of persons.
- Hidden. External aggressive actions are absent, but indirect ways are used. At the same time, one party can be afraid another if it has no powers of authority or character for open fight.
By the number of persons
- Intra personal. The dispute takes place in the person when the opposite motives or requirements equal on force face.
- Interpersonal. When the dispute takes place between several people, group and the person. It is a classical look when it is necessary to resolve a disputable situation, it is the most frequent between two persons.
- Intergroup. A dispute between different offices, groups of people which can unite during upholding of the views.
Resolution of conflicts
- Antagonicheskiye. When all parties, except one, refuse participation in a dispute. Thus one party wins.
- Compromise. When there are several solutions. At the same time the purposes, terms and conditions of interaction of the conflict of participants can change. For example, implementation of a promise could not be carried out because of unforeseen circumstances. Therefore it is possible to hold negotiations and to reach a compromise.
are reckoned also by positive sides. Sociologists believe that disputes to some extent help people to learn to defend the views.