For the last decades in life of married couples a lot of things changed. Until recently the civil marriage was a wonder, and now will surprise nobody with it. And what is interesting: any woman in similar marriage considers that she is married, and here the man, on the contrary, that - it is free. But, alas, unfaithfulness happens irrespective of whether you have a stamp in the passport or not, and nobody from it is insured.
Instruction
1. Most "dangerous" in respect of unfaithfulness the age is considered from twenty eight to forty five years and that the most important, statistically, any marriage from it is not insured. Probability of treason reaches the peak by three, nine or fourteen years of joint life, but you should not be obsessed with it as these figures for each family are especially individual and are not always true.
2. Women do not wish to concede in anything to men today, including, and regarding small affairs which then, suddenly, develop into a divorce. Still the first suffragettes who were once fighting for the rights put forward the main thesis: "Why men have the right to change, and there is no woman?". But also to this day, despite general emancipation, women change much less, than men (almost three times, according to statistical data). Can the thing is that the morality of women is much higher, than at modern men.
3. In general, modern women are considered as more conservative in relation to unfaithfulness, they still adhere to traditional views of matrimony, including themselves "keepers of a home". However one type of women categorically against unfaithfulness, and another does not accept it only for itself, but at the same time not against probable treason of other women at all to receive though some consolation from unfortunate family life. The majority admit that they not against at least once to break marital fidelity, but stir different circumstances: family problems, children and house efforts. Such woman hundred times will think before agreeing to a similar affair.
4. What women change the husbands much less often can be explained also with the fact that they have less for this purpose opportunities, the circle of contacts of the married woman is narrowed to mutual friends, relatives and fellow workers. And if at work there is no suitable candidacy at least for little flirtation, and the moral principles do not allow to start a small affair with the girlfriend's husband, then, in general, and to choose as it there is nobody any more.
5. To men, besides not to have to look for too serious justifications for frequent absences from the house as their choice is huge: the friend invited to drink on a glass of beer; repaired the car or simply was late at work. And if after all the wife considers necessary to check the words of the husband, then any of his friends, of purely male solidarity, will confirm him to "alibi". What it is impossible to tell about female solidarity, the girlfriend, on one to it the known reason, at any time can "put" the friend to the husband. Besides unexpectedly close friendship, until recently not such and close women, can raise questions.
6. Anyway, women's treason if it after all happened, bears much more serious consequences for marriage. Unlike the men considering that treason is not reflected in their relations in family in any way, the woman, having seriously been fond, do not want to be reconciled with rare meetings. If they have serious feelings, then for them the career, reputation and stability of marriage recede into the background, and in this case the divorce is inevitable.