There are two main directions in creation of information projects. These are the websites known to all for people or for short SDL and also satellites. Laudatory SDL on quality it is much better than satellites, such projects are created for the benefit to society, and here satellites are good just the fact that to create them not so difficult though they any do not bear advantage.
Each webmaster would like to have the good project which will be pleasant to people with which the audience will fall in love. But not everyone for some reason selects SDL, and agree to deliberate decline in quality of the website with the purpose to earn as much as possible and as it is possible quicker.
Than satellites are good
All websites are created for the purpose of receiving profit and, in principle, they are created for providing some information or service to people. But it in the theory. In practice it turns out that it is possible to create not absolutely qualitative website and at the same time to earn money. It is executed due to receiving traffic of searchers on low-frequency requests or when using alternative sources of traffic. It is possible to execute monetization in any way, even at the minimum attendance. And the website is simpler, the cheaper and faster it creation, as attracts webmasters. That is they consider that it is possible to create several projects and to adjust financial flow. Therefore many webmasters, especially beginners are guided by creation of satellites.
Why SDL is better than satellites
The problem of any satellite consists in the small term of his life and low profitability. SDL are deprived of such shortcomings, they are pleasant to people, and, respectively, and to search engines. As the audience loyally treats similar projects, webmasters can make from them rather high profit.
However it is not so simple to create SDL. First, it is necessary to think over competently the idea of the project, and here not to do without a certain level of competence of the selected area. Not each person will be able to think up the good website which will be pleasant to people. Also development of SDL requires qualitative content which to receive not so easily. One more shortcoming is that to get profit from such project it will not turn out at once, at first it is necessary to gain trust of people, to make the website popular, and on it a lot of time and means is required. And not each webmaster agrees to put very much in the website especially as the project can not gain popularity - risks are always. Therefore the Internet constantly is replenished with satellites.
But if to overcome all these problems, then further it is possible to receive the qualitative project which will provide the webmaster with profit. Also it is far more pleasant to develop a resource, useful to people, than to do by packs to nobody the unnecessary websites.
If SDL could receive popularity, the webmaster needs only to maintain it at the appropriate level, finding a little time for the website. That is it turns out that at the identical level of income the webmaster will be forced to spend much more time and funds for support of ten satellites while on SDL less time is required and it is more pleasant to work. Therefore SDL will be always much better than any satellite in the long term.