The mankind throughout centuries tried to comprehend the mystery of creation of the perpetual motion machine. Let's talk whether it is possible.
Instruction
1. The perpetual motion machine of the first sort — the imagined (!) device which can infinitely make work without fuel expenses or other energy. On the law of energy conservation, it cannot be made. The impossibility of it is described at the first beginning of thermodynamics. The perpetual motion machine of the second sort — the imagined (!) car which, being started, would turn all heat received from surrounding bodies into work. The impossibility of creation of such car is described as one of formulations of the second beginning of thermodynamics.
2. Here, actually, and all. Paid attention? ""Imagined""! They are absent, these are only imaginations. All attempts of representation something was in the form of the perpetual motion machine reasonably are disproved.
3. You see, in what business. All possible perpetual motion machines are not connected with real life in any way - it is models, there with different degree of an error any given sizes are neglected that actually cannot be done. It is enough to look at the definitions written above precisely to understand: the impossibility of existence and creation of such car is confirmed with basic laws of physics, a basis of all further reasonings, roughly speaking, laws of the nature. Other words, the perpetual motion machine is inherently unnatural.
4. If someone shows you any inventions or you in shop or on TV will see something, stated as the perpetual motion machine, - do not believe. Or this manipulation of your gaps in knowledge, or is just the mechanisms capable some time (but not always) to look and work as similarity of the perpetual motion machine.
5. Think: in case of creation of such car all physical theories actually would fall, many of which are confirmed by experimentally different scientists and different methods is not dependent from each other. It would be just the consciousness revolution, and, the main thing, a denial of the main postulates which have quite certain evidence that it is in every respect absurd.