Between Cindi and Claudia secret rivalry is conducted for a long time. What fitness program for weight loss is better? What is offered by Cindi? What can Claudia answer her with? Let's carry out comparison of two star methods of trainings.
Claudia Schiffer offers the training under the name "Superfitnes". It is the complex of various exercises directed to correction of the figure. Cindi Crawford offers the weight loss method after the delivery – "New measurement" for young mothers. The technique of both complexes is quite similar. Generally and there and there the same exercises, their difference only in trifles are presented.
Minus of these both trainings consists that more modern programs for weight loss are already developed, and though Cindi and Claudia's trainings are in great demand still, "advanced" they will be boring.
To tell that fitness programs from these two models don't promote weight loss, it is impossible. But in some way they are good only for those who train at home. For some reasons for beginners such trainings will be dangerous. Main minuses:
- Both complexes are full of lunges, squats, these exercises can be dangerous to those who only began to play sports and also for women after the delivery as it is easy to injure still weak sheaves.
- The large number of exercises Crawford can be referred to power Pilates correctly to perform these exercises, it is necessary to feel well the muscles therefore the beginner can hardly correctly make it. Therefore the effect can be not too noticeable.
- On the other hand, some exercises very easy, and they will hardly be suitable for "advanced". The exit – to increase weight.
Certainly, these programs have pluses. At Crawford at least five exercises from physical therapy, very good for the waist. Schiffer offers such too, but in smaller quantity. These exercises will help those who have problems with the backbone, they will be suitable and for people unexercised earlier.
If during exercise you not absolutely understand for what you it, and have no feelings in muscles, then it is better not to repeat this exercise. Schiffer's complex simpler and available, but it is quite boring. There are exercises on the dynamic extension, such extension is more dangerous, than static.
Claudia pays much attention to problem zones. Cindi pays attention to the press, hips, buttocks too. But for the correct performance of its exercises there has to be the good coordination.
Summing up the results, one may say, that both complexes have the minuses and pluses, it is quite possible to be engaged on them at home, but for this purpose it is worth introducing some amendments in trainings.
What exercises it is better to remove from Cindi Crawford's complex:
- injury-causing at which you feel that exercises can lead to damage, pinching of the nerve, the trauma;
- exercises on pectoral muscles (for nursing mothers).
What is regarding Claudia Schiffer's complex:
- to remove dynamic lunges, it concerns too stout women and beginners;
- the range of exercises poor, quickly bothers.
Cindi has the good division into the periods which increase loading; quite good exercises from physical therapy. Claudia has the good classical study of problem zones.
The great advantage of these two celebrities is that both of them are mothers, and their perfect bodies inspire on sporting achievements.
To tell what of trainings is better and more effective, difficult. Without having tried for itself, it is impossible to draw the unambiguous conclusion for all. Each person has the individual organism ready to any given loadings.
Selection of the house fitness program has to proceed from own feelings and physical health and preparation. What can be told precisely with confidence that both of these complexes are suitable for those who dream to lose weight.